Can You Stay Registered To Vote In State You Move Out Of

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their ain.

IPOs, or initial public offerings, used to be a source of pride for many companies. Going public was akin to having summited the highest mountain in concern and rung the bell at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). In many ways, information technology still is. What'south more, IPOs aren't just for huge corporations: Start-ups also can become a piece of the pie.

Related: 5 Essential Steps to Set for an IPO

And there are advantages there: Going public yet means more majuscule, more notoriety, more investors and more people looking to be your all-time friend.

Yet, going public has hit a scrap of a snag. More than and more growing companies have started to avoid IPOs altogether. The year 2016 was one of the worst on record for companies to go public, since the recession of 2009. According to venture capital research house, PitchBook, just 49 companies with headquarters in the United States completed public offerings through the third quarter of 2016, raising a combined $7.2 billion.

As for U.S. companieslooking to get public in 2016, their number savage to 3,600 in 2016, downward from seven,500 in 1995, co-ordinate to a working paper from the National Agency of Economics.

This wasn't just a U.S. phenomenon. The U.Grand. also saw its number of IPOs dwindle, from 155, in 2016, to just 97 in 2017, after having reached 480 in 2005.

To what can we aspect this downward trend? Here are a few reasons:

1. For startups, public listings don't offer much of a do good. If a visitor is doing well on its own, there'south no demand to change what's working and sustain the scrutiny that comes with going public. And, more than chiefly, they don't demand the money.

2. The costs. Not wanting to incur the loftier costs of compliance, filings and all of the regulation needed certainly puts a damper on going public. List fees in the Nasdaq exchange, for example, include:

$five,000 for the awarding
$50,000 for issuers with full shares outstanding of 15 million or less
$75,000 issuers with total shares outstanding over 15 one thousand thousand

So in that location are the annual sustaining fees:

$42,000 for issuers with 10 one thousand thousand or less shares outstanding
$55,000 for issuers with $10 million to $fifty million or less in shares outstanding
$75,000 for issuers with over 50 one thousand thousand shares outstanding

Related: From Private to Public: The Options You're Not Considering

At the NYSE, listing and annual sustaining fees are fifty-fifty college. In addition, companies may experience overwhelmed by all the mandatory disclosures and fright that the smallest oversight might lead to bigger bug with regulators, potentially causing them to beexpelled from the stock exchange.

Another gene contributing to this tendency is the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business organization Startups Act (JOBS), which mandated that companies go public if they had more than 500 shareholders. This mandate, signed into law past President Obama, was what brought Facebook out of the shadows in search of more capital.

Finally, private markets accept evolved enough that they can at present provide plenty wealth, making information technology possible for firms to operate outside the regulations that the stock market place demands.

Again, this isn't just about large corporations.

Tech companies haven't been much different in their stance regarding going public: The number of tech or internet companies that did so in 2016 was a big fat zero.

Many so-called "unicorns," in fact, are choosing to stay private, as the average historic period of a tech company that goes public is now eleven years, compared to 4 years of historic period in 1999, according to a 2016 McKinsey report. Consider the wearables company FitBit: Information technology went public in 2015 and saw its stock jump l per centum from its original IPO. Just, despite Fitbit's strong showing and bang-up operating results, the company, just last month, saw its stock price autumn to below $5.

So, the message here is that going public might acquit a sure amount of prestige, but it's not for everyone.

Here are a few pros/cons about whether your own visitor should go public or remain private:

IPO: pros

The principal motivation to go public is money. Going public can bring a large influx of greenbacks that you so invest in the visitor to abound the business.
Company stock tin can be used as currency that can exist bought or sold in the public exchange. That greenbacks tin can be used to acquire other companies and grow your own business faster and strengthen your stance amid your (corporate) peers.
Going public makes information technology easier for you to conduct business. Information technology likewise makes it easier for anyone looking to discover all of the paperwork that has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Committee (SEC).

Staying individual: pros

I've already mentioned how staying private makes you accountable to only a limited number of people: investors, executives and employees. Moreover:

Founders and other executives accept total control over senior executive pay.
Those people can dictate who buys the shares and cull who gets to invest in the company.
Those in charge also get to choose the strategy and direction to accept the company in without having to worry about what Wall Street thinks or what investors' expectations are.

I've always said that the main deviation between Wall Street and Main Street is the number of zeroes. You lot tin can always make up one's mind to go public after, but practise then at your own pace.

IPO: cons

The SEC requires companies to file specific fiscal statements on a quarterly and annual basis, too as comply with legal reporting requirements for cloth transactions and stock-trading by senior executives and board members.
To build some momentum for your IPO, your senior staff will have to spend countless hours on the route, networking and making connections with potential investors and partners, taking fourth dimension abroad from the actual business.

Do you take the time to spend to invest in the plush, fourth dimension-consuming process of going public? Do yous have fourth dimension for the paperwork, the details, the lawyers and the countless human being hours? If the answer is no, y'all're non ready for an IPO.

Staying private: cons

Y'all may not concenter top talent. Public companies avowal that they tin attract peak talent because of the stock options and higher pay they tin can provide. Individual companies sometimes tin can't beget such options, potentially losing out pinnacle, quality talent to bigger companies.
Staying individual limits liquidity for existing investors. Going public makes it harder for them to sell their stake in the company, making the but potential buyers other existing owners. Selling shares in a secondary market tin be challenging, too, because prospective buyers tin can only be accredited investors.

Similar any adept concern decision, you have to balance every pro and con to see if your business is ripe for an IPO. Think about Uber, whose CEO said in 2015 that Uber was at "the junior loftier" school stage of developments and that any talk of going public was like "telling us to get to the prom."

Related: What Kinds of Companies Will Go Public in 2017?

So, assess your ain company. If y'all're yet "in junior high," you lot might do best to skip the prom altogether and get some experience under your belt first. And so, one time you accept that, you can go buy that prom dress or rent that tux. You're ready.